Using Other Acts Evidence in Sex Crime Prosecution

Few evidentiary rules have spawned as much litigation as that which allows the prosecution to use, under certain circumstances, other bad acts of a criminal defendant. The use of such evidence has generated controversy not because it has no appreciable probative value, but instead, as Wigmore once mused, because "it has too much."

Previous
Previous

Appealing Municipal Court judgments to Circuit Court

Next
Next

Using Preliminary Breath Test Results in Trials? Don’t Hold Your Breath